Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15806153›Full record

ArticleOncogene2005

Estrogen-induced loss of progesterone receptor expression in normal and malignant ovarian surface epithelial cells.

Kasturi Mukherjee, Viqar Syed, Shuk-Mei Ho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kasturi MukherjeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Viqar Syed
Shuk-Mei Ho
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Estrogen Receptor-beta and Prostate FunctionR01DK061084 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HO, SHUK-MEI · 2001 to 2004
$1.2M
CYP1A1, estrogen metabolism and ovarian carcinogenesisR01CA094221 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HO, SHUK-MEI · 2002 to 2004
$935k
Molecular Mechanism of Neoplastic TransformationR03CA091250 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SYED, VIQAR · 2002 to 2003
$159k
NCI NIH HHS CA091250NCI NIH HHS CA94221NIDDK NIH HHS DK61084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While estrogens are suspected risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (OCa), progesterone (P4) has been shown to exert protective effects. The biological actions of P4 in target cells are mediated by progesterone receptors (PRs) that exist principally as A- and B-isoforms. We observed overexpression of PR-A and PR-B protein in two lines of OCa cells when compared to two lines of nontumorigenic, normal human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cells. Treatment of HOSE or OCa cells with estrone or 17beta-estradiol at 10(-8) M for a period of 72 h induced significant loss of PR-A and PR-B mRNA and protein expression, with the regulation primarily controlled at the transcriptional level. In contrast, breast cancer cells (line MCF-7) exposed to estrogens upregulated PR-A and PR-B expression. Of significance, both the inhibitory and stimulatory actions of estrogens were blocked by the specific ER-antagonist ICI 182,780 (ICI, 10(-5) M), confirming estrogen specificity. Co-treatment of estrogen-exposed HOSE, OCa, and MCF-7 cell lines with inhibitors of type 1- and type 2-17beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase did not affect the previously observed changes in PR expression, suggesting that the action of each estrogen is direct and not mediated via conversion to its metabolic counterpart. Green fluorescence protein (GFP)-PR-A and GFP-PR-B were localized in the cytoplasmic compartment of untreated HOSE cells and translocated to the nucleus after P4 treatment, while both chimera PRs resided in the nuclei of OCa cells in a ligand-independent manner. In OCa cell cultures, P4 (10(-6) M), but not RU486 (10(-5) M), induced apoptosis that was blocked by co-treatment with the antiprogestin but enhanced by co-treatment with ICI. In sharp contrast, P4 induced proliferation, while ICI and RU486 caused cell death in MCF-7 cells. In conclusion, this study is first to demonstrate estrogens as negative regulators of PR expression in HOSE/OCa cells and to provide a mechanistic basis upon which to explain the antagonism of estrogens on the anti-OCa action of progestins. It also raises the possibility of using progestin and ICI as a combinational therapy for OCa treatment.

Indexed as

AdultApoptosisCells, CulturedCycloheximideDactinomycinDown-RegulationEpithelial CellsEstrogensFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCycloheximideDactinomycinEstrogensProgesteroneReceptors, ProgesteroneRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15806153
OpenAlexW2100251396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.