Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15805531›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2005

MinC mutants deficient in MinD- and DicB-mediated cell division inhibition due to loss of interaction with MinD, DicB, or a septal component.

Huaijin Zhou, Joe Lutkenhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Morphology engineering: a new strategy to construct microbial cell factories.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MinE conformational dynamics regulate membrane binding, MinD interaction, and Min oscillation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gene product 0.4 increases bacteriophage T7 competitiveness by inhibiting host cell division.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huaijin ZhouDepartment of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Joe Lutkenhaus

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY CORE (JANUARY 1 - JUNE 30, 2005)P20RR016443 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUTKENHAUS, JOSEPH F · 2001 to 2010
$21.3M
REGULATION OF CELL DIVISIONR37GM029764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUTKENHAUS, JOSEPH F · 2000 to 2010
$4.8M
REGULATION OF EXPRESSION OF CELL DIVISION GENESR01GM029764 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUTKENHAUS, JOSEPH F · 1985 to 2022
$4.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR016443NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016443NIGMS NIH HHS GM 29764NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029764NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM029764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The min locus encodes a negative regulatory system that limits formation of the cytokinetic Z ring to midcell by preventing its formation near the poles. Of the three Min proteins, MinC is the inhibitor and prevents Z-ring formation by interacting directly with FtsZ. MinD activates MinC by recruiting it to the membrane and conferring a higher affinity on the MinCD complex for a septal component. MinE regulates the cellular location of MinCD by inducing MinD, and thereby MinC, to oscillate between the poles of the cell, resulting in a time-averaged concentration of MinCD on the membrane that is lowest at midcell. MinC can also be activated by the prophage-encoded protein DicB, which targets MinC to the septum without recruiting it first to the membrane. Previous studies have shown that the C-terminal domain of MinC is responsible for the interaction with MinD, DicB, and the septal component. In the present study, we isolated mutations in the C-terminal domain of MinC that affected its interaction with MinD, DicB, and the septal component. Among the mutations isolated, R133A and S134A are specifically deficient in the interaction with MinD, E156A is primarily affected in the interaction with DicB, and R172A is primarily deficient in the interaction with the septum. These mutations differentiate the interactions of MinC with its partners and further support the model of MinCD- and MinC-DicB-mediated cell division inhibition.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularMutationThermotoga maritimaAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMinC protein, E coliMinD protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID15805531
PMCPMC1070367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.