Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15804965›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurovirology2005

Rabies virus receptors.

Monique Lafon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurovirology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 312 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Conserved use of tetraspanin CD9 as an entry receptor by rhabdoviruses spanning multiple genera.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Properties and Application of Pseudotyped Lentiviral Vectors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Molecular Engineering of Virus Tropism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The Interactions between Cells and Viruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monique LafonUnité de Neuroimmunologie Virale, Département de Neuroscience, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France. mlafon@pasteur.fr
Institut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is convincing in vitro evidence that the muscular form of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), the neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) bind rabies virus and/or facilitate rabies virus entry into cells. Other components of the cell membrane, such as gangliosides, may also participate in the entry of rabies virus. However, little is known of the role of these molecules in vivo. This review proposes a speculative model that accounts for the role of these different molecules in entry and trafficking of rabies virus into the nervous system.

Indexed as

Receptors, VirusAnimalsHumansNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesNeuronsRabies virusReceptor, Nerve Growth FactorReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorReceptors, NicotinicNeural Cell Adhesion MoleculesReceptor, Nerve Growth FactorReceptors, Nerve Growth FactorReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID15804965
OpenAlexW1982076909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.