Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15802507›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Subdivision of large introns in Drosophila by recursive splicing at nonexonic elements.

James M Burnette, Etsuko Miyamoto-Sato, Marc A Schaub, Jamie Conklin, A Javier Lopez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The "cutting edge" of non-canonical RNA splicing.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Non-Canonical Splicing and Its Implications in Brain Physiology and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James M BurnetteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Etsuko Miyamoto-Sato
Marc A Schaub
Jamie Conklin
A Javier Lopez
Carnegie Mellon University · USYokohama National University · JP

Funding

REGULATION OF TISSUE-SPECIFIC RNA SPLICING IN DROSOPHILAR01HD028664 · NICHD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI LOPEZ, A JAVIER · 1992 to 2002
$644k
DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL OF ALTERNATIVE SPLICINGK02HD001155 · NICHD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI LOPEZ, A JAVIER · 1996 to 2000
$69k
NICHD NIH HHS K02-HD01155NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD28664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genes with important roles in development and disease contain exceptionally long introns, but special mechanisms for their expression have not been investigated. We present bioinformatic, phylogenetic, and experimental evidence in Drosophila for a mechanism that subdivides many large introns by recursive splicing at nonexonic elements and alternative exons. Recursive splice sites predicted with highly stringent criteria are found at much higher frequency than expected in the sense strands of introns >20 kb, but they are found only at the expected frequency on the antisense strands, and they are underrepresented within introns <10 kb. The predicted sites in long introns are highly conserved between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura, despite extensive divergence of other sequences within the same introns. These patterns of enrichment and conservation indicate that recursive splice sites are advantageous in the context of long introns. Experimental analyses of in vivo processing intermediates and lariat products from four large introns in the unrelated genes kuzbanian, outspread, and Ultrabithorax confirmed that these introns are removed by a series of recursive splicing steps using the predicted nonexonic sites. Mutation of nonexonic site RP3 within Ultrabithorax also confirmed that recursive splicing is the predominant processing pathway even with a shortened version of the intron. We discuss currently known and potential roles for recursive splicing.

Indexed as

IntronsAlternative SplicingAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineComputational BiologyDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA PrimersDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsExonsGene DeletionHomeodomain ProteinsInsectaModels, GeneticDNA PrimersDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsRNARNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsUbx protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID15802507
PMCPMC1450422
OpenAlexW2150001578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.