Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15802090›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2005

Genetic advances in autism hinge on the method of measuring symptoms.

Richard D Todd

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of CBD-EnrichedFrontiers in neurology · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard D ToddDepartments of Psychiatry and Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. toddr@psychiatry.wustl.edu
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genotyping and related technologies and the study of families with two or more autistic siblings have allowed the reporting of various genetic linkage and candidate gene association studies for autism. Despite this significant research effort, there still is no general agreement on the role of particular genes that predispose to the risk of autism. One source of general debate is whether core symptoms studied in research on the heredity of autism include single or multiple independent genetic domains. In this review, it is argued that failure to control for co-existing dimensions of psychopathology and lack of assessment of parents may lead to misinterpretation of genetic findings from pedigrees involving multiple affected family members.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutistic DisorderChildChromosome MappingDiseases in TwinsGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic ResearchGenotypeHumansPhenotypeGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID15802090
OpenAlexW2010620592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.