Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15800204›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Analysis of host response to bacterial infection using error model based gene expression microarray experiments.

Dov J Stekel, Donatella Sarti, Victor Trevino, Lihong Zhang, Mike Salmon, Chris D Buckley, Mark Stevens, Mark J Pallen, Charles Penn, Francesco Falciani

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dov J StekelSchool of Biosciences, The University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Donatella Sarti
Victor Trevino
Lihong Zhang
Mike Salmon
Chris D Buckley
Mark Stevens
Mark J Pallen
Charles Penn
Francesco Falciani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key step in the analysis of microarray data is the selection of genes that are differentially expressed. Ideally, such experiments should be properly replicated in order to infer both technical and biological variability, and the data should be subjected to rigorous hypothesis tests to identify the differentially expressed genes. However, in microarray experiments involving the analysis of very large numbers of biological samples, replication is not always practical. Therefore, there is a need for a method to select differentially expressed genes in a rational way from insufficiently replicated data. In this paper, we describe a simple method that uses bootstrapping to generate an error model from a replicated pilot study that can be used to identify differentially expressed genes in subsequent large-scale studies on the same platform, but in which there may be no replicated arrays. The method builds a stratified error model that includes array-to-array variability, feature-to-feature variability and the dependence of error on signal intensity. We apply this model to the characterization of the host response in a model of bacterial infection of human intestinal epithelial cells. We demonstrate the effectiveness of error model based microarray experiments and propose this as a general strategy for a microarray-based screening of large collections of biological samples.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBacterial InfectionsEscherichia coli InfectionsGene Expression ProfilingHumansNF-kappa BOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsNF-kappa B

Identifiers

PMID15800204
PMCPMC1072804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.