Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15800009›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2005

A comparison of two primary care trials on tennis elbow: issues of external validity.

N Smidt, M Lewis, E M Hay, D A W M Van der Windt, L M Bouter, P Croft

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02378285 (Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of Autologous Conditioned Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02378285 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Epicondylitis by Ultrasound-guided Local Injections of Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP®): a Double-blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial With One-year Follow-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorArthrex SASRan2010 to 2014Enrolled50ConditionsEpicondylitisArmsACP, Saline solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N SmidtPrimary Care Science Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK. n.smidt@vumc.nl
M Lewis
E M Hay
D A W M Van der Windt
L M Bouter
P Croft

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess clinical heterogeneity across two studies with respect to study population, interventions, and outcome measures, and to evaluate the influence of these sources of heterogeneity on the results of the studies.

methodsThe individual patient data were used from two randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of conservative treatments in patients with tennis elbow in primary care. Patients were allocated at random to treatment with steroid injection, wait and see policy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, placebo tablets, or physiotherapy. Outcome measures included severity of the main complaint, inconvenience of the elbow complaints, pain during the day, elbow disability, pain-free grip strength, and global improvement. All outcomes were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after randomisation.

resultsThe two study populations were similar with respect to age, sex, comorbid neck/shoulder complaints, and baseline scores for the severity of pain. However, significant differences were observed for employment status, duration of elbow complaints, dominant side affected, previous history of elbow complaints, and use of analgesics. Local injections differed between the two studies with respect to volume, number, and steroid preparation. However, after 1, 6, and 12 months, the treatment effects of steroid injections were very similar between the study populations.

conclusionsDespite large differences in study population at baseline, the responses to steroid injections were remarkably similar. Also the responses to other conservative interventions and the placebo treatment were very consistent, suggesting a uniform course of a tennis elbow and a lack of influence of clinical heterogeneity.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedNaproxenPain MeasurementPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsTennis ElbowTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGlucocorticoidsNaproxen

Identifiers

PMID15800009
PMCPMC1755250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.