Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15799942›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2005

Force enhancement and relaxation rates after stretch of activated muscle fibres.

Dilson E Rassier, Walter Herzog

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Eccentric muscle contractions: from single muscle fibre to whole muscle mechanics.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. CURRENT CONCEPTS OF PLYOMETRIC EXERCISE.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Residual force enhancement in skeletal muscle.The Journal of physiology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dilson E RassierHuman Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4. rassier@kin.ucalgary.ca
Walter Herzog
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The residual force enhancement following muscle stretch might be associated with an increase in the proportion of attached cross-bridges, as supported by stiffness measurements. In this case, it could be caused by an increase in the attachment or a decrease in the detachment rate of cross-bridges, or a combination of the two. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the stretch-induced force enhancement is related to cross-bridge attachment/detachment kinetics. Single muscle fibres dissected from the lumbrical muscle of frog were place at a length approximately 20% longer than the plateau of the force-length relationship; they were maximally activated, and after full isometric force was reached, ramp stretches were imposed with amplitudes of 5 and 10% fibre length, at a speed of 40% fibre length s(-1). Experiments were performed in Ringer's solution, and with the addition of 2, 5 and 10 nM of 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM), a drug that places cross-bridges in a pre-power-stroke, state, inhibiting force production. The total force following stretch was higher than the corresponding force measured after isometric contraction at the corresponding length. This residual force enhancement was accompanied by an increase relaxation time. BDM, which decreases force production during isometric contractions, considerably increased the relative levels of force enhancement. BDM also increased relaxation times after stretch, beyond the levels observed during reference contractions in Ringer's solution, and beyond isometric control tests at the corresponding BDM concentrations. Together, these results support the idea that force enhancement is caused, at least in part, by a decrease in cross-bridge detachment rates, as manifested by the increased relaxation times following fibre stretch.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDiacetylIsometric ContractionKineticsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle RelaxationRana pipiensDiacetyldiacetylmonoxime

Identifiers

PMID15799942
PMCPMC1578706
OpenAlexW2048733766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.