Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15799709›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2005

Evolutionary origins of genomic repertoires in bacteria.

Emmanuelle Lerat, Vincent Daubin, Howard Ochman, Nancy A Moran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed, 345 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Evolution of gene order in prokaryotes is driven primarily by gene gain and loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of Clinically RelevantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmanuelle LeratDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Vincent Daubin
Howard Ochman
Nancy A Moran
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explaining the diversity of gene repertoires has been a major problem in modern evolutionary biology. In eukaryotes, this diversity is believed to result mainly from gene duplication and loss, but in prokaryotes, lateral gene transfer (LGT) can also contribute substantially to genome contents. To determine the histories of gene inventories, we conducted an exhaustive analysis of gene phylogenies for all gene families in a widely sampled group, the gamma-Proteobacteria. We show that, although these bacterial genomes display striking differences in gene repertoires, most gene families having representatives in several species have congruent histories. Other than the few vast multigene families, gene duplication has contributed relatively little to the contents of these genomes; instead, LGT, over time, provides most of the diversity in genomic repertoires. Most such acquired genes are lost, but the majority of those that persist in genomes are transmitted strictly vertically. Although our analyses are limited to the gamma-Proteobacteria, these results resolve a long-standing paradox-i.e., the ability to make robust phylogenetic inferences in light of substantial LGT.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialBacteriaBacterial ProteinsGenetic VariationGene Transfer TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15799709
PMCPMC1073693
OpenAlexW1976841360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.