Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15798898›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2005

Reduction of abdominal wall blood flow by clamping or carbon dioxide insufflation increases tumor growth in the abdominal wall: an experimental study in rats.

O Lundberg, A Kristoffersson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O LundbergDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University Hospital, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden. owe.lundberg@surgery.umu.se
A Kristoffersson
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have previously demonstrated that there is a reduction of blood flow in the abdominal wall in rats insufflated with air concomitant with an increase in tumor growth. The present study was designed to examine whether a reduction of blood flow achieved by clamping or insufflation with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) would increase tumor growth in the abdominal wall.

methodsIn the first part of the experiments, laser Doppler blood flow of both rectus muscles was measured in 16 Wistar Fu rats. The left rectus muscle was clamped to reduce blood flow, and 5 x 10(4) adenocarcinoma cells were injected into both rectus muscles. Clamping was maintained for 45 min. In the second part, 22 rats had 5 x 10(4) adenocarcinoma cells injected into the rectus muscle and blood flow was measured. The experimental group (n = 11) was insufflated with CO(2) at 10 mmHg for 45 min; the control group (n = 11) was not insufflated. After 9 days, tumor weight and volume were analyzed.

resultsClamping caused a 69% reduction of blood flow (p < 0.001), whereas no reduction was registered on the nonclamped side. Tumor weight (p = 0.028) and volume (p = 0.030) were increased on the clamped side. The insufflation of CO(2) caused a 71% reduction of blood flow, whereas no reduction was registered in the control group. Tumor weight (p = 0.006) and volume (p = 0.006) were increased in the insufflated group.

conclusionClamping, as well as CO(2) insufflation, causes a significant reduction of blood flow in the abdominal wall, which seems to increase tumor growth at the same site.

Indexed as

ConstrictionAbdominal NeoplasmsAbdominal WallAdenocarcinomaAnimalsCarbon DioxideDisease ProgressionInjections, IntramuscularInsufflationIschemiaLaser-Doppler FlowmetryNeoplasm TransplantationPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPressureRandom AllocationRatsCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID15798898
OpenAlexW2005012586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.