Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15795408›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2005

Effects of making emergency contraception available without a physician's prescription: a population-based study.

Judith A Soon, Marc Levine, Brenda L Osmond, Mary H H Ensom, David W Fielding

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barriers and facilitators to family planning access in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ["Emergency contraception 2010"].Atencion primaria · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006
    Article
  15. Prescription to over-the-counter deregulation in Canada: are we ready for it, or do we need to be?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Article
  16. Emergency contraception.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Article
  17. Emergency contraception.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Article
  18. Emergency contraception moves behind the counter.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Enhancing access to contraception through pharmacist prescribing across Canada.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith A SoonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA. jasoon@interchange.ubc.ca [corrected]
Marc Levine
Brenda L Osmond
Mary H H Ensom
David W Fielding
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely access to emergency contraception has the potential to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and subsequent abortions. A public health policy initiative in British Columbia beginning in December 2000 allowed pharmacists to provide emergency contraceptives (ECs) without a prescription. We sought to determine changes in EC use after the policy was introduced and to analyze EC use with data generated by the policy.

methodsAll Ovral, Preven and Plan B EC prescriptions from Jan. 1, 1996, to Dec. 31, 2003, were identified through the BC PharmaNet and Medical Services Plan administrative databases and the data analyzed to determine changes between 1996 and 2002. Changes over time were determined in the frequency of EC provision, choice of EC agent, frequency of EC use by age group, repeat use and geographic distribution of EC prescription for the pre- and post-policy periods. Anonymized patient-specific data from treatment consent forms were used to describe the reason for EC use, interval between unprotected intercourse and EC prescription, proportion prescribed for immediate or future use, referrals for regular birth control and STD screening and concomitant antiemetic use. Consent data also provided the time in the menstrual cycle that the EC was requested.

resultsThe number of EC prescriptions increased from a pre-policy mean of 8805 (99% confidence interval 7823-9787) in the years 1996 to 2000 to a post-policy total in 2002 of 17 794. Physicians prescribed the levonorgestrel regimen (Plan B) less frequently than did pharmacists. The frequency of EC use was highest among women aged 20-24 years across all study years, and all age groups demonstrated a post-policy increase in use. On average, 2.1% of the women received an EC 3 or more times a year over the period of the study. More women in urban regions received ECs than women in more rural areas of the province. Analysis of pharmacist treatment consent forms used in 2001 and 2002 showed that 56.2% of women receiving an EC reported using a method of birth control that had failed, 55.7% of pharmacist-provided ECs were obtained within 24 hours after unprotected intercourse, 1.1% of ECs were obtained for future use, antiemetics were provided to 57.7% of women receiving the Yuzpe regimen (Ovral, Preven) and to 20.5% of women receiving levonorgestrel, and women tended to seek ECs when unprotected intercourse occurred at the time of highest risk of pregnancy in their menstrual cycle. Women in greatest financial need obtained ECs more frequently from physicians than from pharmacists.

interpretationThe policy change that granted pharmacists authority to provide ECs to women without a physician's prescription did not simply expand EC availability but was associated with an overall increase in EC use in the province.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, Postcoital, HormonalAdolescentAdultAge DistributionAlgorithmsBritish ColumbiaChildDatabases as TopicDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationEthinyl Estradiol-Norgestrel CombinationFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelMedical Record LinkageMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedContraceptives, Postcoital, HormonalEthinyl Estradiol-Norgestrel CombinationLevonorgestrelEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID15795408
PMCPMC554872
OpenAlexW2168031236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.