Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15795256›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Virus-specific and bystander CD8 T cells recruited during virus-induced encephalomyelitis.

Audrey M Chen, Nivedita Khanna, Stephen A Stohlman, Cornelia C Bergmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bystander activated CD8Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Expansion of an Unusual Virtual Memory CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Memory T Cell Migration.Frontiers in immunology · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In situ recognition of autoantigen as an essential gatekeeper in autoimmune CD8+ T cell inflammation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Selective retention of herpes simplex virus-specific T cells in latently infected human trigeminal ganglia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Audrey M ChenDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 1333 San Pablo St., MCH 148, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Nivedita Khanna
Stephen A Stohlman
Cornelia C Bergmann

Funding

VIRUS ENTRY AS A DETERMINANT OF MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS NEUROTROPISMP01NS018146 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERGMANN, CORNELIA · 1985 to 2007
$10.4M
PERSISTENT VIRUS ON CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM IMMUNITYR01NS040667 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STOHLMAN, STEPHEN A. · 2000 to 2004
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS NS18146NINDS NIH HHS NS40667NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS018146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotropic coronavirus-induced encephalitis was used to evaluate recruitment, functional activation, and retention of peripheral bystander memory CD8+ T cells. Mice were first infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing a non-cross-reactive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epitope, designated p18. Following establishment of an endogenous p18-specific memory CD8+ T-cell population, mice were challenged with coronavirus to directly compare recruitment, longevity, and activation characteristics of both primary coronavirus-specific and bystander memory populations trafficking into the central nervous system (CNS). HIV-specific memory CD8+ T cells were recruited early into the CNS as components of the innate immune response, preceding CD8+ T cells specific for the dominant coronavirus epitope, designated pN. Although pN-specific T-cell numbers gradually exceeded bystander p18-specific CD8+ T-cell numbers, both populations peaked concurrently within the CNS. Nevertheless, coronavirus-specific CD8+ T cells were preferentially retained. By contrast, bystander CD8+ T-cell numbers declined to background numbers following control of CNS virus replication. Furthermore, in contrast to highly activated pN-specific CD8+ T cells, bystander p18-specific CD8+ T cells recruited to the site of inflammation maintained a nonactivated memory phenotype and did not express ex vivo cytolytic activity. Therefore, analysis of host CD8+ T-cell responses to unrelated infections demonstrates that bystander memory CD8+ T cells can comprise a significant proportion of CNS inflammatory cells during virus-induced encephalitis. However, transient CNS retention and the absence of activation suggest that memory bystander CD8+ T cells may not overtly contribute to pathology in the absence of antigen recognition.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalFlow CytometryHIVImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSpleen

Identifiers

PMID15795256
PMCPMC1069536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.