Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15793127›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Effect of mupirocin treatment on nasal, pharyngeal, and perineal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy adults.

Heiman F L Wertheim, Jeroen Verveer, Hélène A M Boelens, Alex van Belkum, Henri A Verbrugh, Magreet C Vos

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dutch guideline on the laboratory detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic Resistance ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Cutting Periprosthetic Infection Rate:Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-Term Sinonasal Carriage ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Interplay of nasal and rectal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heiman F L WertheimErasmus MC, University Hospital Rotterdam, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.wertheim@erasmusmc.nl
Jeroen Verveer
Hélène A M Boelens
Alex van Belkum
Henri A Verbrugh
Magreet C Vos
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is an important risk factor for S. aureus infections. Mupirocin nasal ointment is presently the treatment of choice for decolonizing the anterior nares. However, recent clinical trials show limited benefit from mupirocin prophylaxis in preventing nosocomial S. aureus infections, probably due to (re)colonization from extranasal carriage sites. Therefore, we studied the effectiveness of mupirocin nasal ointment treatment on the dynamics of S. aureus nasal and extranasal carriage. Twenty noncarriers, 26 intermittent carriers, and 16 persistent carriers had nasal, throat, and perineum samples taken 1 day before and 5 weeks after mupirocin treatment (twice daily for 5 days) and assessed for growth of S. aureus. The identities of cultured strains were assessed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the coagulase and protein A genes. The overall carriage rate (either nasal, pharyngeal, or perineal carrier or a combination) was significantly reduced after mupirocin treatment from 30 to 17 carriers (P = 0.003). Of the 17 carriers, 10 (60%) were still colonized with their old strain, 6 (35%) were colonized with an exogenous strain, and 1 (5%) was colonized with both. Two noncarriers became carriers after treatment. The acquisition of exogenous strains after mupirocin treatment is a common phenomenon. The finding warrants the use of mupirocin only in proven carriers for decolonization purposes. Mupirocin is effective overall in decolonizing nasal carriers but less effective in decolonizing extranasal sites.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateHumansMupirocinNoseOintmentsPerineumPharynxStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMupirocinOintments

Identifiers

PMID15793127
PMCPMC1068605
OpenAlexW2106629070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.