Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15793113›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Testing of the in vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to six antifungal agents by using the Sensititre system in comparison with a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5- [(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay and a modified NCCLS method.

Wendy W J van de Sande, Ad Luijendijk, Abdalla O A Ahmed, Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg, Alex van Belkum

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. In vitro susceptibility testing for black grain eumycetoma causative agents.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2021
    Article
  10. Development and Validation of anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  11. Diagnostic implications of mycetoma derived from Madurella pseudomycetomatis isolates from Mexico.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mycetoma due toIDCases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mycetoma medical therapy.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendy W J van de SandeDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.vandesande@erasmusmc.nl
Ad Luijendijk
Abdalla O A Ahmed
Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg
Alex van Belkum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibilities of 36 clinical isolates of Madurella mycetomatis, the prime agent of eumycetoma in Africa, to ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine were determined by the Sensititre YeastOne system. This system appeared to be a rapid and easy test, and by use of hyphal suspensions it generated results comparable to those of a modified NCCLS method. After 10 days of incubation, the antifungal activities of ketoconazole (MIC at which 90% of isolates were inhibited [MIC90], 0.125 microg/ml), itraconazole (MIC90, 0.064 microg/ml), and voriconazole (MIC90, 0.125 microg/ml) appeared superior to those of fluconazole (MIC90, 128 microg/ml) and amphotericin B (MIC90, 1 microg/ml), with MICs in the clinically relevant range. All isolates were resistant to flucytosine (all MICs above 64 microg/ml). Based on the relatively broad range of MICs obtained for the antifungal agents, routine testing of M. mycetomatis isolates for susceptibility to antifungal agents seems to be relevant to adequate therapeutic management.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAntifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, FungalFlucytosineHumansMadurellaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsTetrazolium Salts2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-((phenylamino)carbonyl)-2H-tetrazolium hydroxideAntifungal AgentsFlucytosineReagent Kits, DiagnosticTetrazolium Salts

Identifiers

PMID15793113
PMCPMC1068587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.