Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15793100›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

In vitro susceptibility testing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates cultured from patients with erythema migrans before and after antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Klaus-Peter Hunfeld, Eva Ruzic-Sabljic, Douglas E Norris, Peter Kraiczy, Franc Strle

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Lyme borreliosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. The In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Persistent Borrelia burgdorferiClinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  11. Lyme Disease Frontiers: ReconcilingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A newEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Review
  16. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Persister Development by Borrelia burgdorferi Populations In Vitro.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Klaus-Peter HunfeldInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Paul-Ehrlich Str. 40, D-60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. K.Hunfeld@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Eva Ruzic-Sabljic
Douglas E Norris
Peter Kraiczy
Franc Strle
Johns Hopkins University · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZGoethe University Frankfurt · DELjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical treatment failures have been reported to occur in early Lyme borreliosis (LB) for many suitable antimicrobial agents. Investigations of possible resistance mechanisms of the Borrelia burgdorferi complex must analyze clinical isolates obtained from LB patients, despite their receiving antibiotic treatment. Here, borrelial isolates obtained from five patients with erythema migrans (EM) before the start of antibiotic therapy and again after the conclusion of treatment were investigated. The 10 isolates were characterized by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and plasmid profile analysis and subjected to susceptibility testing against a variety of antimicrobial agents including those used for initial chemotherapy. Four out of five patients were infected by the same genospecies (Borrelia afzelii, n = 3; Borrelia garinii, n = 1) at the site of the EM lesion before and after antimicrobial therapy. In one patient the genospecies of the initial isolate (B. afzelii) differed from that of the follow-up isolate (B. garinii). No significant changes in the in vitro susceptibilities became obvious for corresponding clinical isolates before the start and after the conclusion of antimicrobial therapy. This holds true for the antimicrobial agents used for specific chemotherapy of the patients, as well as for any of the additional agents tested in vitro. Our study substantiates borrelial persistence in some EM patients at the site of the infectious lesion despite antibiotic treatment over a reasonable time period. Borrelial persistence, however, was not caused by increasing MICs or minimal borreliacidal concentrations in these isolates. Therefore, resistance mechanisms other than acquired resistance to antimicrobial agents should be considered in patients with LB resistant to treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBorrelia burgdorferi GroupCulture MediaErythema Chronicum MigransFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPlasmidsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID15793100
PMCPMC1068612
OpenAlexW2141073911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.