Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15793085›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2005

Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004.

P McCrory, K Johnston, W Meeuwisse, M Aubry, R Cantu, J Dvorak, T Graf-Baumann, J Kelly, M Lovell, P Schamasch

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Clinical practice guidelines for mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

P McCroryCenter for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine & The Brain Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. paulmccr@bigpond.net.au <paulmccr@bigpond.net.au>
K Johnston
W Meeuwisse
M Aubry
R Cantu
J Dvorak
T Graf-Baumann
J Kelly
M Lovell
P Schamasch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In November 2001, the 1st International Symposium on Concussion in Sport was held in Vienna, Austria to provide recommendations for the improvement of safety and health of athletes who suffer concussive injuries in ice hockey, football (soccer), and other sports. The 2nd International Symposium on Concussion in Sport was organised by the same group and held in Prague, Czech Republic in November 2004. It resulted in a revision and update of the Vienna consensus recommendations, which are presented here.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionDiagnostic ImagingHumans

Identifiers

PMID15793085
PMCPMC1725173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.