Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15791369›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2004

Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients.

S Delgado, D Momblán, L Salvador, R Bravo, A Castells, A Ibarzabal, J M Piqué, A M Lacy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015.Cancer research and treatment · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer: how patient selection and complications differ by approach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Current status of robotic colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Initial surgical experience in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and lower third rectal cancer: short-term results.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S DelgadoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
D Momblán
L Salvador
R Bravo
A Castells
A Ibarzabal
J M Piqué
A M Lacy
Universitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe applicability of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colorectal diseases is still controversial. Early reports on laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in patients with colon cancer suggested that it minimizes surgical trauma, decreases perioperative complications, and leads to a more rapid recovery. To our knowledge, no previous studies have compared the laparoscopic vs the open approach in rectal cancer. The aim of this paper was to assess the results of laparoscopic techniques in patients with rectal cancer.

methodsFrom March 1998 to February 2003, all patients admitted to our unit with adenocarcinoma of the rectum were evaluated for surgery by the laparoscopic approach.

resultsA total of 220 patients with a mean age of 67.3 years were included in the study. One hundred thirty patients (59%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In >75% of the patients, a surgical procedure with sphincter preservation was performed. The rate of conversion to the open approach was 20%. Ten patients had intraoperative complications. Fifty-eight patients (26.3%) developed postoperative complications. The length of hospital stay was 6.8 days. The distribution of tumor stages was as follows: stage I, 16.81%; stage II, 33.6%; stage III, 26.36%; stage IV, 19.09%. The mean number of lymph nodes was 13.8. The incidence of local relapse was 5.3%, with a follow-up of 18 months.

conclusionLaparoscopic surgery can be safely performed in patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum with good short-term results. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID15791369
OpenAlexW2071396427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.