ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2005
[Established and current procedures in wound healing].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Evaluation and Mechanism Analysis of the Fiber Shedding Property of Textile Pile Debridement Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Response of endothelial cells and pericytes to hypoxia and erythropoietin in a co-culture assay dedicated to soft tissue repair.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2015Article
- Bromelain down-regulates myofibroblast differentiation in an in vitro wound healing assay.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2013Article
- Soft tissue fibroblasts from well healing and chronic human wounds show different rates of myofibroblasts in vitro.Molecular biology reports · 2013Article
- [Causes of leg ulcers. Analysis of the data from a dermatologic wound care center].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2009Article
- [Pathogenesis of chronic wounds].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2008Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most chronic wounds are caused by arterial or venous vascular disease. Wound care is an interdisciplinary task and economic challenge. Numerous new wound dressings and treatment methods have been introduced recently. Basic research has enhanced our understanding of stimulation and inhibition of wound healing. Well-constructed clinical studies have shown some traditional approaches to be effective and others, less so. Successful wound healing requires treatment of the underlying disease as well as correction of local factors that may delay healing. The choice of dressings must be based on continuous re-assessment of the wound. Modern approaches for the most common types of chronic wounds, as well as options such as vacuum treatment and tissue-engineered skin are presented along with information on latest rules for reimbursement for wound care in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.