Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15782290›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2005

[Diseases of the lacrimal gland].

N Fichter, M Schittkowski, R F Guthoff

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rare Diseases of the Orbit.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021
    Review
  2. [Exophthalmos and chorioretinal folds].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
  3. [Orbital neoplasia. Part II: mesenchymal, leukemic, lymphoproliferative and bony tumors, metastasis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N FichterUniversitäts-Augenklinik Rostock. nicole.fichter@med.uni-rostock.de
M Schittkowski
R F Guthoff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience with the differential diagnosis of lacrimal gland illnesses is limited in daily practice due to their rarity. It is therefore of particular importance to have guidelines for the practitioner by which he can decide on the application of conservative or surgical therapy, and whether it is necessary to take a biopsy to clarify the diagnosis. There is a wide spectrum of possible illnesses which include systemic diseases, inflammatory disorders, neoplastic, benign and malignant tumors. When a pleomorphic adenoma cannot be excluded, biopsy is contraindicated and complete tumor excision with its capsule is necessary to prevent the possibility of malignant transformation and a negative effect on long-term prognosis. In this overview, special interest is placed on the typical clinical aspects and imaging features of lesions of the lacrimal gland fossa, their differential diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

Adenoma, PleomorphicBiopsyCell Transformation, NeoplasticDiagnosis, DifferentialEye NeoplasmsHumansLacrimal ApparatusLacrimal Apparatus DiseasesPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.