Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15781866›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Enhanced T cell-mediated protection against malaria in human challenges by using the recombinant poxviruses FP9 and modified vaccinia virus Ankara.

Daniel P Webster, Susanna Dunachie, Jenni M Vuola, Tamara Berthoud, Sheila Keating, Stephen M Laidlaw, Samuel J McConkey, Ian Poulton, Laura Andrews, Rikke F Andersen and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02925403 (A Phase Ib Randomised, Controlled, Single-blind Study to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate R21 With Matrix-M1 Adjuvant in West African Adult Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02925403 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Phase Ib Randomised, Controlled, Single-blind Study to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate R21 With Matrix-M1 Adjuvant in West African Adult Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2016 to 2017Enrolled13ConditionsMalariaArmsR21/Matrix-M1, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Controlled Human Malaria Infection Studies in Africa-Past, Present, and Future.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P WebsterCentre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK.
Susanna Dunachie
Jenni M Vuola
Tamara Berthoud
Sheila Keating
Stephen M Laidlaw
Samuel J McConkey
Ian Poulton
Laura Andrews
Rikke F Andersen
Philip Bejon
Geoff Butcher
Robert Sinden
Michael A Skinner
Sarah C Gilbert
Adrian V S Hill
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBChurchill Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G84/6323Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is a major global health problem for which an effective vaccine is required urgently. Prime-boost vaccination regimes involving plasmid DNA and recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara-encoding liver-stage malaria antigens have been shown to be powerfully immunogenic for T cells and capable of inducing partial protection against experimental malaria challenge in humans, manifested as a delay in time to patent parasitemia. Here, we report that substitution of plasmid DNA as the priming vector with a specific attenuated recombinant fowlpox virus, FP9, vaccine in such prime-boost regimes can elicit complete sterile protection that can last for 20 months. Protection at 20 months was associated with persisting memory but not effector T cell responses. The protective efficacy of various immunization regimes correlated with the magnitude of induced immune responses, supporting the strategy of maximizing durable T cell immunogenicity to develop more effective liver-stage vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFowlpox virusHumansImmunity, CellularImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GImmunologic MemoryInterferon-gammaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedPlasmidsImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteinsthrombospondin-related adhesive protein, protozoanVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID15781866
PMCPMC555695
OpenAlexW2114643485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.