Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15781700›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Quantitative trait locus study design from an information perspective.

Saunak Sen, Jaya M Satagopan, Gary A Churchill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combining DNA pooling with selective recombinant genotyping for increased efficiency in fine mapping.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. R/qtlDesign: inbred line cross experimental design.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2007
    Article
  14. Sequential quantitative trait locus mapping in experimental crosses.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2007
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A review of statistical methods for expression quantitative trait loci mapping.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2006
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saunak SenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94143, USA. sen@biostat.ucsf.edu
Jaya M Satagopan
Gary A Churchill

Funding

Systems Genetic Analysis of Multi-parent CrossesR01GM070683 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BROMAN, KARL W, CHURCHILL, GARY A · 2004 to 2022
$6.8M
Epidemiologic Parameters of Rare Cancer Risk FactorsR01CA098438 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI BEGG, COLIN B · 2003 to 2005
$839k
TWO STAGE DESIGNS FOR LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUMR01GM060457 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2000 to 2002
$413k
NCI NIH HHS CA098438NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098438NIGMS NIH HHS GM070683NIGMS NIH HHS GM60457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the efficiency of different genotyping and phenotyping strategies in inbred line crosses from an information perspective. This provides a mathematical framework for the statistical aspects of QTL experimental design, while guiding our intuition. Our central result is a simple formula that quantifies the fraction of missing information of any genotyping strategy in a backcross. It includes the special case of selectively genotyping only the phenotypic extreme individuals. The formula is a function of the square of the phenotype and the uncertainty in our knowledge of the genotypes at a locus. This result is used to answer a variety of questions. First, we examine the cost-information trade-off varying the density of markers and the proportion of extreme phenotypic individuals genotyped. Then we evaluate the information content of selective phenotyping designs and the impact of measurement error in phenotyping. A simple formula quantifies the information content of any combined phenotyping and genotyping design. We extend our results to cover multigenotype crosses, such as the F(2) intercross, and multiple QTL models. We find that when the QTL effect is small, any contrast in a multigenotype cross benefits from selective genotyping in the same manner as in a backcross. The benefit remains in the presence of a second unlinked QTL with small effect (explaining <20% of the variance), but diminishes if the second QTL has a large effect. Software for performing power calculations for backcross and F(2) intercross incorporating selective genotyping and marker spacing is available from http://www.biostat.ucsf.edu/sen.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociResearch DesignAnimalsChromosome MappingData Interpretation, StatisticalGenotypeLikelihood FunctionsLod ScoreMiceModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID15781700
PMCPMC1449722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.