Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1577866›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1992

Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules.

D Chrétien, F Metoz, F Verde, E Karsenti, R H Wade

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 246 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural switching of tubulin in the microtubule lattice.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Structure of the γ-tubulin ring complex-capped microtubule.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Phenol-soluble modulins PSMα3 and PSMβ2 form nanotubes that are cross-α amyloids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D ChrétienLaboratoire de Biologie Structurale, CEA, Grenoble, France.
F Metoz
F Verde
E Karsenti
R H Wade
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens to study microtubules assembled both from three cycle purified tubulin (3x-tubulin) and in cell free extracts of Xenopus eggs. In vitro assembled 3x-tubulin samples have a majority of microtubules with 14 protofilaments whereas in cell extracts most microtubules have 13 protofilaments. Microtubule polymorphism was observed in both cases. The number of protofilaments can change abruptly along individual microtubules usually by single increments but double increments also occur. For 3x-tubulin, increasing the magnesium concentration decreases the proportion of 14 protofilament microtubules and decreases the average separation between transitions in these microtubules. Protofilament discontinuities may correspond to dislocation-like defects in the microtubule surface lattice.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ExtractsMagnesiumMicroscopy, ElectronMicrotubulesOvumTubulinXenopus laevisCell ExtractsMagnesiumTubulin

Identifiers

PMID1577866
PMCPMC2289483
OpenAlexW2159335259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.