Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15778508›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2005

Understanding sex biases in immunity: effects of estrogen on the differentiation and function of antigen-presenting cells.

Greg Nalbandian, Susan Kovats

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sex differences in cardiovascular response to sepsis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex differences in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Estradiol Enhances Antiviral CD4Journal of virology · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Greg NalbandianDivision of Immunology, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, CA 91010, USA.
Susan Kovats
City of Hope · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initiation and perpetuation of innate and adaptive immunity is dependent on the ability of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to sense inflammatory stimuli; produce cytokines; and internalize, degrade, and present antigens via surface major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, and B lymphocytes express estrogen receptors, indicating that the steroid sex hormone estrogen might directly modulate the function of these cells during immune responses. Sex-specific parameters of immune function have been identified during autoimmunity and the pathogenesis of infectious disease, which show sex biases in their incidence and manifestation; female immunity also varies as estrogen levels change. In this article, we summarize studies that demonstrate effects of estrogen on the differentiation or function of APCs in model in vitro systems, or under circumstances of natural or imposed variation in estrogen levels in vivo.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsCell DifferentiationEstrogensFemaleHumansImmunity, InnateInfectionsMaleReceptors, EstrogenEstrogensReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID15778508
OpenAlexW2085151337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.