Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15775830›Full record

ArticleMedGenMed : Medscape general medicine2004

A survey of kidney disease and risk-factor information on the World Wide Web.

José Luis Calderón, Ashraf Zadshir, Keith Norris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Kidney Disease Among African Americans: A Population Perspective.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Socioeconomic disparities in chronic kidney disease.Advances in chronic kidney disease · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dietary protein intake and renal function.Nutrition & metabolism · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Luis CalderónCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ashraf Zadshir
Keith Norris
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · US

Funding

VITAMIN D FOR PREVENTION OF FIBROSIS AND REGULATION OF CELL CYCLE PROGRESSIONU54RR019234 · NCRR · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI FORGE, NELL · 2003 to 2009
$14.7M
RESEARCH INFORMATICS COREG12RR003026 · NCRR · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI BAKER, RICHARD S. · 1986 to 2004
$11.5M
DREW/UCLA Project Export CenterP20MD000148 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHAPIRO, MARTIN F · 2002 to 2006
$3.6M
UCLA/DREW/RAND PROGRAM TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN HEALTHP01HS010858 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHAPIRO, MARTIN F · 2000 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS P01 HS010858AHRQ HHS P01 HS 10858NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003026NCRR NIH HHS G12-RR03026NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR019234NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000148NIMHD NIH HHS P20-MD00148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is epidemic, and informing those at risk is a national health priority. However, the discrepancy between the readability of health information and the literacy skills of those it targets is a recognized barrier to communicating health information that may promote good health outcomes. Because the World Wide Web has become one of the most important sources of health information, we sought to assess the readability of commonly available CKD information.

methodsTwelve highly cited English-language, kidney disease Web sites were identified with 4 popular search engines. Each Web site was reviewed for the availability of 6 domains of information germane to CKD and risk-factor information. We estimated readability scores with the Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch Reading Ease Index methods. The deviation of readability scores for CKD information from readability appropriate to average literacy skills and the limited literacy skills of vulnerable populations (low socioeconomic status, health disparities, and elderly) were calculated.

resultsEleven Web sites met the inclusion criteria. Six of 11 sites provided information on all 6 domains of CKD and risk-factor information. Mean readability scores for all 6 domains of CKD information exceeded national average literacy skills and far exceeded the fifth-grade-level readability desired for informing vulnerable populations. Information about CKD and diabetes consistently had higher readability scores.

conclusionInformation on the World Wide Web about CKD and its risk factors may not be readable for comprehension by the general public, especially by underserved minority populations with limited literacy skills. Barriers to health communication may be important contributors to the rising CKD epidemic and disparities in CKD health status experienced by minority populations.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationInternetChronic DiseaseCommunication BarriersHumansKidney DiseasesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID15775830
PMCPMC1480557
OpenAlexW1481465784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.