ArticleJournal of bacteriology2005
Structural and genetic characterization of the Shigella boydii type 10 and type 6 O antigens.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The biosynthetic origin of ribofuranose in bacterial polysaccharides.Nature chemical biology · 2022Article
- Cluster-specific gene markers enhanceMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- Stereoselective β-mannosylations and β-rhamnosylations from glycosyl hemiacetals mediated by lithium iodide.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Structure and genetics of Escherichia coli O antigens.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Article
- Shigella Diversity and Changing Landscape: Insights for the Twenty-First Century.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016Review
- Emergence of a novel Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O serogroup cross-reacting with Shigella boydii type 10.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
- Development of a serotype-specific DNA microarray for identification of some Shigella and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparison of the O antigens of Shigella boydii types 10 and 6 by chemical analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy showed that their structures are similar, with the only difference being the presence or absence of d-ribofuranose, which is the immunodominant sugar in S. boydii type 10. In S. boydii type 6, a residue previously reported as alpha-d-GlcpA, was shown to be beta-d-GlcpA as in S. boydii type 10. S. boydii types 10 and 6 are reported not to cross-react serologically, and the role of d-ribofuranose in the specificity of S. boydii was confirmed by making a mutant of type 10 that lacked d-ribofuranose. However, S. boydii type 11, which has a d-ribofuranose but with different linkage does show cross-reaction with type 10. The O-antigen gene loci of S. boydii types 10 and 6 were shown to be virtually identical except that orf8 (wbaM), which was confirmed as the ribofuranosyltransferase gene, is interrupted by IS629 in type 6. Therefore, it is proposed that the O-antigen gene cluster of S. boydii type 6 was derived from type 10 by an IS element insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.