Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15774721›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2005

Chromatin and RNAi factors protect the C. elegans germline against repetitive sequences.

Valérie J P Robert, Titia Sijen, Josien van Wolfswinkel, Ronald H A Plasterk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Imaging of Actin Cytoskeletal Integrity During Aging in C. elegans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valérie J P RobertHubrecht Laboratory, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Titia Sijen
Josien van Wolfswinkel
Ronald H A Plasterk
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protection of genomes against invasion by repetitive sequences, such as transposons, viruses, and repetitive transgenes, involves strong and selective silencing of these sequences. During silencing of repetitive transgenes, a trans effect ("cosuppression") occurs that results in silencing of cognate endogenous genes. Here we report RNA interference (RNAi) screens performed to catalog genes required for cosuppression in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. We find factors with a putative role in chromatin remodeling and factors involved in RNAi. Together with molecular data also presented in this study, these results suggest that in C. elegans repetitive sequences trigger transcriptional gene silencing using RNAi and chromatin factors.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA InterferenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChromatinGene SilencingRNA, Double-StrandedTranscription, GeneticChromatinRNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID15774721
PMCPMC1074315
OpenAlexW2044604140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.