Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15774026›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2005

Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression.

Pavel V Baranov, Andrew W Hammer, Jiadong Zhou, Raymond F Gesteland, John F Atkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Widespread loss-of-function mutations implicating preexisting resistance to new or repurposed anti-tuberculosis drugs.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative genomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Firmicutes-enriched ISBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pavel V BaranovDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330, USA. baranov@genetics.utah.edu
Andrew W Hammer
Jiadong Zhou
Raymond F Gesteland
John F Atkins

Funding

RECODING--DYNAMIC REPROGRAMMING OF GENETIC READOUTR01GM048152 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ATKINS, JOHN F. · 1992 to 2004
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM48152NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscription slippage occurs on certain patterns of repeat mononucleotides, resulting in synthesis of a heterogeneous population of mRNAs. Individual mRNA molecules within this population differ in the number of nucleotides they contain that are not specified by the template. When transcriptional slippage occurs in a coding sequence, translation of the resulting mRNAs yields more than one protein product. Except where the products of the resulting mRNAs have distinct functions, transcription slippage occurring in a coding region is expected to be disadvantageous. This probably leads to selection against most slippage-prone sequences in coding regions.

resultsTo find a length at which such selection is evident, we analyzed the distribution of repetitive runs of A and T of different lengths in 108 bacterial genomes. This length varies significantly among different bacteria, but in a large proportion of available genomes corresponds to nine nucleotides. Comparative sequence analysis of these genomes was used to identify occurrences of 9A and 9T transcriptional slippage-prone sequences used for gene expression.

conclusionsIS element genes are the largest group found to exploit this phenomenon. A number of genes with disrupted open reading frames (ORFs) have slippage-prone sequences at which transcriptional slippage would result in uninterrupted ORF restoration at the mRNA level. The ability of such genes to encode functional full-length protein products brings into question their annotation as pseudogenes and in these cases is pertinent to the significance of the term 'authentic frameshift' frequently assigned to such genes.

Indexed as

AdenosineBacteriaBase SequenceComputational BiologyDNA Transposable ElementsGenes, BacterialGenome, BacterialGenomicsModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataOpen Reading FramesRNA, BacterialSelection, GeneticSequence AlignmentThymidineTranscription, GeneticAdenosineDNA Transposable ElementsRNA, BacterialThymidine

Identifiers

PMID15774026
PMCPMC1088944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.