Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15772699›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2005

Analysis of VH gene sequences using two web-based immunogenetics resources gives different results, but the affinity maturation status of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia clones as assessed from either of the resulting data sets has no prognostic significance.

B S Lane, A A Mensah, K Lin, A R Pettitt, P D Sherrington

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B S LaneDepartment of Haematology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
A A Mensah
K Lin
A R Pettitt
P D Sherrington

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some cellular and molecular features of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cells that are associated with prognosis may reflect the context within which their progenitors encountered antigen. It follows that the nature of antigen drive in CLL could influence the clinical course and we were prompted to assess the impact, if any, of affinity maturation (an antigen-driven process) on prognosis. Statistical models for assessing affinity maturation status are typically applied to V(H) gene sequence data analysed using a web-based resource like IMGT or VBASE. Since these resources differ with respect to some key relevant features, we evaluated a cohort of CLL cases by applying statistical models to V(H) data derived from both IMGT and VBASE. Important differences between the resulting data sets became apparent. These resulted from database variance and because IMGT and VBASE define complementarity-determining and framework regions (CDRs, FRs) in different ways. Thus, the numbers of mutations identified and their distribution between CDRs/FRs varied between the data sets for the majority of clones. Consequently, two different but overlapping sets of cases with evidence of affinity maturation were defined. Notwithstanding their differences, no significant associations of affinity maturation status with CD38 expression, p53 functional status or survival were identifiable in either data set.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, GeneticADP-ribosyl CyclaseADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1AgedAntigens, CDClone CellsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansImmunogeneticsImmunoglobulin FragmentsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsADP-ribosyl CyclaseADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1Antigens, CDCD38 protein, humanImmunoglobulin FragmentsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsMembrane GlycoproteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID15772699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.