Trial reportBMC medicine2005
The effects of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin on cause-specific mortality and on cancer incidence in 20,536 high-risk people: a randomised placebo-controlled trial [ISRCTN48489393].
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Statins on the Incidence and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Pooled it
- The association between statin use and endometrial cancer survival outcome: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Statin use and survival outcomes in endocrine-related gynecologic cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- LDL-lowering therapy and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Statin use and breast cancer survival and risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2015Pooled it
- The effect of statin therapy on heart failure events: a collaborative meta-analysis of unpublished data from major randomized trials.European heart journal · 2015 · on this mapPooled it
- Statin use and risk of kidney cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Statin use is not associated with reduced risk of skin cancer: a meta-analysis.British journal of cancer · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Can statin therapy reduce the risk of melanoma? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of epidemiology · 2010Pooled it
- Effect of statins type on incident prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Asian journal of andrologyPooled it
- An intervention study of the general practice management of older adults with cardiovascular metabolic comorbidities.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily on muscle and liver adverse effects in a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial in 20,536 high-risk people.BMC clinical pharmacology · 2009Trial
- Changes in cholesterol-lowering medications use over a decade in community-dwelling older adults.The Annals of pharmacotherapyTrial
- Guideline for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Elderly in China (2024 Edition).Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2024Article
- Statin Eligibility according to 2013 ACC/AHA and USPSTF Guidelines among Jordanian Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Impact of Gender.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2023Observational
- Review
- Evidence on Statins, Omega-3, and Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.The world journal of men's health · 2022Review
- Association of Statin Use with the Risk of Incident Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere have been concerns that low blood cholesterol concentrations may cause non-vascular mortality and morbidity. Randomisation of large numbers of people to receive a large, and prolonged, reduction in cholesterol concentrations provides an opportunity to address such concerns reliably.
methods20,536 UK adults (aged 40-80 years) with vascular disease or diabetes were randomly allocated to receive 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo. Prespecified safety analyses were of cause-specific mortality, and of total and site-specific cancer incidence. Comparisons between all simvastatin-allocated versus all placebo-allocated participants (ie, "intention-to-treat") involved an average difference in blood total cholesterol concentration of 1.2 mmol/L (46 mg/dL) during the scheduled 5-year treatment period.
resultsThere was a highly significant 17% (95% CI 9-25) proportional reduction in vascular deaths, along with a non-significant reduction in all non-vascular deaths, which translated into a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (p = 0.0003). The proportional reduction in the vascular mortality rate was about one-sixth in each subcategory of participant studied, including: men and women; under and over 70 years at entry; and total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L or LDL cholesterol below 3.0 mmol/L. No significant excess of non-vascular mortality was observed in any subcategory of participant (including the elderly and those with pretreatment total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L), and there was no significant excess in any particular cause of non-vascular mortality. Cancer incidence rates were similar in the two groups, both overall and in particular subcategories of participant, as well as at particular primary sites. There was no suggestion that any adverse trends in non-vascular mortality or morbidity were beginning to emerge with more prolonged treatment.
conclusionThese findings, which are based on large numbers of deaths and non-fatal cancers, provide considerable reassurance that lowering total cholesterol concentrations by more than 1 mmol/L for an average of 5 years does not produce adverse effects on non-vascular mortality or cancer incidence. Moreover, among the many different types of high-risk individual studied, simvastatin 40 mg daily consistently produced substantial reductions in vascular (and, hence, all-cause) mortality, as well as in the rates of non-fatal heart attacks, strokes and revascularisation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.