Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15771624›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2005

Identification of hemoglobin-alpha and -beta subunits as potential serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Ahn Woong-Shick, Park Sung-Pil, Bae Su-Mi, Lee Joon-Mo, Namkoong Sung-Eun, Nam Gye-Hyun, Cho Young-Lae, Choi Ho-Sun, Jun Heung-Jae, Kim Chong-Kook and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ahn Woong-ShickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Park Sung-Pil
Bae Su-Mi
Lee Joon-Mo
Namkoong Sung-Eun
Nam Gye-Hyun
Cho Young-Lae
Choi Ho-Sun
Jun Heung-Jae
Kim Chong-Kook
Kim Young-Wan
Han Byoung-Don
Jin Hyun-Sun
Catholic University of Korea · KRBristol-Myers Squibb (South Korea) · KRChonnam National University · KRSeoul National University · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRTaegu Science University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new biomarkers for ovarian cancer is clearly necessary for the improved detection and monitoring of the disease. Surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) can be employed in the identification of differentially expressed proteins in cancer cells. The objective of this study was, then, to identify potential diagnostic serological biomarkers for ovarian cancer. We performed protein expression difference analyses of 45 serum samples using SELDI protein chip array. Forty-five sera obtained from ovarian cancer patients (n=35) and normal healthy females (n=10), were profiled on the surface of SELDI protein chip. The candidate biomarkers were purified by CM-Sepharose, and their N-terminal amino sequence was determined. The amounts of hemoglobin (Hb) in cancer patient's sera versus that of normal sera were measured by ELISA. Nine sera proteins that were found to be significantly differentially expressed (P<0.05) between the sera of ovarian cancer patients and that of normal healthy females were selected using the WCX2 array. The most distinctive polypeptide peaks detected in the ovarian cancer samples were at 15.1 and 15.8 kDa and these two peaks were identified as the hemoglobin-alpha (Hb-alpha) and -beta (Hb-beta) chain, respectively. ELISA indicated that the sensitivity for intact Hb level was 77% in sera obtained from ovarian cancer patients, as compared with normal healthy female sera. In conclusion, two ovarian cancer biomarker proteins were discovered and identified as Hb-alpha and Hb-beta. Hb levels were significantly different in ovarian cancer serum samples and those obtained from normal healthy females, as determined by ELISA. Additional studies are required to further validate Hb-alpha and Hb-beta biomarkers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHemoglobin AHumansMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProtein Array AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorHemoglobin A

Identifiers

PMID15771624
PMCPMC11158023
OpenAlexW2005563588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.