Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15771236›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2005

Prediction of human drug clearance from in vitro and preclinical data using physiologically based and empirical approaches.

Kiyomi Ito, J Brian Houston

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Recent developments inDrug metabolism reviews · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. An examination of protein binding and protein-facilitated uptake relating to in vitro-in vivo extrapolation.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiyomi ItoSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
J Brian Houston
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of five methods for predicting in vivo intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) and seven for predicting hepatic clearance (CL(h)) in humans using in vitro microsomal data and/or preclinical animal data.

methodsThe human CL(int) was predicted for 33 drugs by five methods that used either in vitro data with a physiologic scaling factor (SF), with an empirical SF, with the physiologic and drug-specific (the ratio of in vivo and in vitro CL(int) in rats) SFs, or rat CL(int) directly and with allometric scaling. Using the estimated CL(int), the CL(h) in humans was calculated according to the well-stirred liver model. The CL(h) was also predicted using additional two methods: using direct allometric scaling or drug-specific SF and allometry.

resultsUsing in vitro human microsomal data with a physiologic SF resulted in consistent underestimation of both CL(int) and CL(h). This bias was reduced by using either an empirical SF, a drug-specific SF, or allometry. However, for allometry, there was a substantial decrease in precision. For drug-specific SF, bias was less reduced, precision was similar to an empirical SF. Both CL(int) and CL(h) were best predicted using in vitro human microsomal data with empirical SF. Use of larger data set of 52 drugs with the well-stirred liver model resulted in a best-fit empirical SF that is 9-fold increase on the physiologic SF.

conclusionsOverall, the empirical SF method and the drug-specific SF method appear to be the best methods; they show lower bias than the physiologic SF and better precision than allometric approaches. The use of in vitro human microsomal data with an empirical SF may be preferable, as it does not require extra information from a preclinical study.

Indexed as

Empirical ResearchAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMicrosomes, LiverPharmaceutical PreparationsPredictive Value of TestsProtein BindingRatsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID15771236
OpenAlexW2171671443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.