Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15767415›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Mechanisms of nonrandom human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and double infection: preference in virus entry is important but is not the sole factor.

Jianbo Chen, Que Dang, Derya Unutmaz, Vinay K Pathak, Frank Maldarelli, Douglas Powell, Wei-Shau Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HIV-1 reverse transcription.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianbo ChenHIV Drug Resistance Program, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Que Dang
Derya Unutmaz
Vinay K Pathak
Frank Maldarelli
Douglas Powell
Wei-Shau Hu

Funding

T Cell Activation Signals That Regulate HIV-1 InfectionR01AI049131 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI UNUTMAZ, DERYA · 2001 to 2005
$1.6M
Role of Connection and RNase H Domains of HIV-1 RT in Antiviral Drug ResistanceZ01BC010532 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PATHAK, VINAY K. · 2003 to 2008
$1.1M
Retroviral Double Infection and RecombinationZ01BC010505 · BC · BASIC SCIENCES · PI HU, WEI-SHAU · 2003 to 2006
–
HIV Genetic Variation in HIV-Infected IndividualsZ01BC010730 · BC · BASIC SCIENCES · PI COFFIN, JOHN M · 2006 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049131NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-49131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is nonrandom and that double infection occurs more frequently than predicted from random events. To probe the possible mechanisms for nonrandom infection, we examined the role of HIV-1 entry pathways by using viruses pseudotyped with either CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Env or vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV G). These two proteins use different receptors and entry pathways. We found that regardless of the protein used, double infection occurred more frequently than random events, indicating nonrandom HIV-1 infection in both entry pathways. However, the frequency of double infection differed significantly, depending on the envelope protein. In primary CD4(+) T cells, double infection occurred most frequently when both viruses had CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Env and least frequently when the two viruses had different envelopes. These results indicated that the preference in virus entry was a significant but not the only factor contributing to nonrandom double infection. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the CD4 expression level in primary T cells affects their susceptibility to CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection but not VSV G-pseudotyped HIV-1 infection. We have also examined infection with two viruses pseudotyped with CCR5- or CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 Env and have found that double infection occurred more frequently than random events. These results indicate that coreceptor usage is not a barrier to recombination between the two virus populations. In our previous study, we also demonstrated nonrandom double infection via dendritic cell (DC)-mediated HIV-1 transmission. To test our hypothesis that multiple HIV-1 virions are transmitted during DC-T-cell contact, we used two populations of DCs, each capturing one vector virus, and added both DC populations to T cells. We observed a decreased frequency of double infection compared with experiments in which DCs captured both viruses simultaneously. Therefore, these results support our hypothesis that multiple virions are transmitted from DCs to T cells during cell-mediated HIV-1 transmission.

Indexed as

CD4 AntigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineCells, CulturedDendritic Cellsenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGene Products, envHIV-1HumansMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, HIVViral Envelope ProteinsCD4 Antigensenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusGene Products, envgp140 envelope protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1G protein, vesicular stomatitis virusMembrane GlycoproteinsReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, HIVViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15767415
PMCPMC1061529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.