ArticleBMC health services research2005
International variation in prescribing antihypertensive drugs: its extent and possible explanations.
Article in BMC health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic evaluation and transferability of physical activity programmes in primary prevention: a systematic review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2010Pooled it
- From guidelines to practice: antihypertensive prescribing preferences in Türkiye-the APP-Türkiye study.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Suboptimal heart rate control despite beta-blocker use in coronary artery disease: evidence from the Fasa PERSIAN cohort.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Adherence to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes CKD Guideline in Nephrology Practice Across Countries.Kidney international reports · 2021Article
- Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research.Ochsner journal · 2020Review
- Assessment of hypertension control and factors associated with the control among hypertensive patients attending at Zewditu Memorial Hospital: a cross sectional study.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- Seeding trials: Marketing gimmick or credible scientific research.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
- Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and risk of lung cancer: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- The production and sales of anti-tuberculosis drugs in China.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2016Article
- Publication and non-publication of drug trial results: a 10-year cohort of trials in Norwegian general practice.BMJ open · 2016Review
- Risk of hip fracture among older people using antihypertensive drugs: a nationwide cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2015Article
- Old habits die hard: a nationwide utilization study of short-acting nifedipine in Taiwan.PloS one · 2014Article
- Comparing effectiveness of two anticoagulation management models in a Malaysian tertiary hospital.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2013Article
- Difference of antihypertensive prescribing between office- and hospital-based clinics in Taiwan.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012Article
- Choice of initial antihypertensive drugs and persistence of drug use--a 4-year follow-up of 78,453 incident users.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Article
- [Use of prescription drugs in Spain and Europe].Atencion primaria · 2012Review
- Spectrum of antihypertensive therapy in South Asians at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- GPs' opinions of public and industrial information regarding drugs: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInexpensive antihypertensive drugs are at least as effective and safe as more expensive drugs. Overuse of newer, more expensive antihypertensive drugs is a poor use of resources. The potential savings are substantial, but vary across countries, in large part due to differences in prescribing patterns. We wanted to describe prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs in ten countries and explore possible reasons for inter-country variation.
methodsNational prescribing profiles were determined based on information on sales and indications for prescribing. We sent a questionnaire to academics and drug regulatory agencies in Canada, France, Germany, UK, US and the Nordic countries, asking about explanations for differences in prescribing patterns in their country compared with the other countries. We also conducted telephone interviews with medical directors of drug companies in the UK and Norway, the countries with the largest differences in prescribing patterns.
resultsThere is considerable variation in prescribing patterns. In the UK thiazides account for 25% of consumption, while the corresponding figure for Norway is 6%. In Norway alpha-blocking agents account for 8% of consumption, which is more than twice the percentage found in any of the other countries. Suggested factors to explain inter-country variation included reimbursement policies, traditions, opinion leaders with conflicts of interests, domestic pharmaceutical production, and clinical practice guidelines. The medical directors also suggested hypotheses that: Norwegian physicians are early adopters of new interventions while the British are more conservative; there are many clinical trials conducted in Norway involving many general practitioners; there is higher cost-awareness among physicians in the UK, in part due to fund holding; and there are publicly funded pharmaceutical advisors in the UK.
conclusionTwo compelling explanations the variation in prescribing that warrant further investigation are the promotion of less-expensive drugs by pharmaceutical advisors in UK and the promotion of more expensive drugs through "seeding trials" in Norway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.