Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15762904›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2005

Critical pathway effectiveness: assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis.

Sydney M Dy, Pushkal Garg, Dorothy Nyberg, Patricia B Dawson, Peter J Pronovost, Laura Morlock, Haya Rubin, Albert W Wu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations.Annual review of public health · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Implementation and Evaluation of a Clinical Pathway for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Procedures: a Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sydney M DyMaryland Community Hospice, Room 609, 624N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pushkal Garg
Dorothy Nyberg
Patricia B Dawson
Peter J Pronovost
Laura Morlock
Haya Rubin
Albert W Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo qualitatively describe patient, hospital care, and critical pathway characteristics that may be associated with pathway effectiveness in reducing length of stay. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingAdministrative data and review of pathway documentation and a sample of medical records for each of 26 surgical critical pathways in a tertiary care center's department of surgery, 1988-1998. STUDY

designRetrospective qualitative study. DATA COLLECTION/ABSTRACTION

methodsUsing information from a literature review and consultation with experts, we developed a list of characteristics that might impact critical pathway effectiveness. We used hypothesis-driven qualitative comparative analysis to describe key primary and secondary characteristics that might differentiate effective from ineffective critical pathways. PRINCIPAL

findings" All 7 of the 26 pathways associated with a reduced length of stay had at least one of the following characteristics: (1) no preexisting trend toward lower length of stay for the procedure (71 percent), and/or (2) it was the first pathway implemented in its surgical service (71 percent). In addition, pathways effective in reducing length of stay tended to be for procedures with lower patient severity of illness, as indicated by fewer intensive care days and lower mortality. Effective pathways tended to be used more frequently than ineffective pathways (77 versus 59 percent of medical records with pathway documents present), but high rates of documented pathway use were not necessary for pathway effectiveness.

conclusionsCritical pathway programs may have limited effectiveness, and may be effective only in certain situations. Because pathway utilization was not a strong predictor of pathway effectiveness, the mechanism by which critical pathways may reduce length of stay is unclear.

Indexed as

Medical AuditBaltimoreCohort StudiesCritical PathwaysHealth Services ResearchHospitals, UniversityHumansLength of StayPostoperative CareQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurgery Department, HospitalSurgical Procedures, OperativeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID15762904
PMCPMC1361153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.