ArticleHealth services research2005
From adversary to partner: have quality improvement organizations made the transition?
Article in Health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Beyond demonstrations: implementing a primary care hybrid payment model in Medicare.Health affairs scholar · 2023Review
- How Type of Practice Ownership Affects Participation with Quality Improvement External Facilitation: Findings from EvidenceNOW.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Beyond Measurement and Reward: Methods of Motivating Quality Improvement and Accountability.Health services research · 2015Article
- Sexual self schema as a moderator of sexual and psychological outcomes for gynecologic cancer survivors.Archives of sexual behavior · 2009Article
- Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.Health services research · 2007Article
- Are quality improvement messages registering?Health services research · 2005Article
- Significance of Medicare and Medicaid programs for the practice of medicine.Health care financing reviewArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the perceived impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) on quality of care for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, in the context of new efforts to work more collaboratively with hospitals in the pursuit of quality improvement. DATA SOURCE: Primary data collected from a national random sample of 105 hospital quality management directors interviewed between January and July 2002. STUDY
designWe interviewed quality management directors concerning their interactions with the QIO interventions, the helpfulness of QIO interventions and the degree to which they helped or hindered their hospital quality efforts, and their recommendations for improving QIO effectiveness. PRINCIPLE
findingsMore than 90% of hospitals reported that their QIO had initiated specific interventions, the most common being the provision of educational materials, benchmark data, and hospital performance data. Many respondents (60%) rated most QIO interventions as helpful or very helpful, although only one-quarter of respondents believed quality of care would have been worse without the QIO interventions. To increase QIO efficacy, respondents recommended that QIOs appeal more directly to senior administration, target physicians (not just hospital employees), and enhance the perceived validity and timeliness of data used in quality indicators.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that the QIOs have overcome, to some degree, the previously adversarial and punitive roles of Peer Review Organizations with hospitals. The generally positive view among most hospital quality improvement directors concerning the QIO interventions suggests that QIOs are potentially poised to take a leading role in promoting quality of care. However, the full potential of QIOs will likely not be realized until QIOs are able to engender greater engagement from senior hospital administration and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.