Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15761405›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2005

Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses.

Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, David J Weber, Maria F Gergen-Teague, Mark D Sobsey, Gregory P Samsa, William A Rutala

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Veterinary Clinics as Reservoirs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strategies to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Quantifying the Viral Reduction Achieved Using Ash and Sand as Handwashing Agents.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Norovirus in Cancer Patients: A Review.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily E Sickbert-BennettDepartment of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Health Care System, North Carolina, USA. esickber@unch.unc.edu
David J Weber
Maria F Gergen-Teague
Mark D Sobsey
Gregory P Samsa
William A Rutala
University of North Carolina Health Care · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care-associated infections most commonly result from person-to-person transmission via the hands of health care workers.

methodsWe studied the efficacy of hand hygiene agents (n = 14) following 10-second applications to reduce the level of challenge organisms (Serratia marcescens and MS2 bacteriophage) from the hands of healthy volunteers using the ASTM-E-1174-94 test method.

resultsThe highest log 10 reductions of S marcescens were achieved with agents containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), triclosan, benzethonium chloride, and the controls, tap water alone and nonantimicrobial soap and water (episode 1 of hand hygiene, 1.60-2.01; episode 10, 1.60-3.63). Handwipes but not alcohol-based handrubs were significantly inferior from these agents after a single episode of hand hygiene, but both groups were significantly inferior after 10 episodes. After a single episode of hand hygiene, alcohol/silver iodide, CHG, triclosan, and benzethonium chloride were similar to the controls in reduction of MS2, but, in general, handwipes and alcohol-based handrubs showed significantly lower efficacy. After 10 episodes, only benzethonium chloride (1.33) performed as well as the controls (1.59-1.89) in the reduction of MS2.

conclusionsAntimicrobial handwashing agents were the most efficacious in bacterial removal, whereas waterless agents showed variable efficacy. Alcohol-based handrubs compared with other products demonstrated better efficacy after a single episode of hand hygiene than after 10 episodes. Effective hand hygiene for high levels of viral contamination with a nonenveloped virus was best achieved by physical removal with a nonantimicrobial soap or tap water alone.

Indexed as

Hand DisinfectionAdultBenzethoniumChlorhexidineCross InfectionDisinfectantsHumansInfection ControlLevivirusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSerratia marcescensSurface-Active AgentsTriclosanBenzethoniumChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateDisinfectantsSurface-Active AgentsTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID15761405
PMCPMC7252025
OpenAlexW2063869384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.