Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15761020›Full record

Trial reportBlood2005

Use of glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF (lenograstim) during and/or after induction chemotherapy in patients 61 years of age and older with acute myeloid leukemia: final results of AML-13, a randomized phase-3 study.

Sergio Amadori, Stefan Suciu, Ulrich Jehn, Roberto Stasi, Xavier Thomas, Jean-Pierre Marie, Petra Muus, Francois Lefrère, Zwi Berneman, George Fillet and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00002719 (RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY TO EVALUATE THE VALUE OF rHuG-CSF IN INDUCTION AND OF AN ORAL SCHEDULE AS CONSOLIDATION TREATMENT IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUMEKIA), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00002719 phase3completednot on this map

RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY TO EVALUATE THE VALUE OF rHuG-CSF IN INDUCTION AND OF AN ORAL SCHEDULE AS CONSOLIDATION TREATMENT IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUMEKIA (AML-13 PROTOCOL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCRan1995Enrolled500ConditionsLeukemia, NeutropeniaArmsfilgrastim, amsacrine, carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Senior adult oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Improving Immunotherapy Through Glycodesign.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio AmadoriDepartment of Hematology, University Tor Vergata, St Eugenio Hospital, P.le dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144 Rome, Italy. mc7673@mclink.it
Stefan Suciu
Ulrich Jehn
Roberto Stasi
Xavier Thomas
Jean-Pierre Marie
Petra Muus
Francois Lefrère
Zwi Berneman
George Fillet
Claudio Denzlinger
Roel Willemze
Pietro Leoni
Giuseppe Leone
Marco Casini
Francesco Ricciuti
Marco Vignetti
Filip Beeldens
Franco Mandelli
Theo De Witte
EORTC/GIMEMA Leukemia Group
St. Eugenio Hospital · IT

Funding

EORTC HEADQUARTERSU10CA011488 · NCI · EUROPEAN ORG/RES/TREATMENT/CANCER · PI LACOMBE, DENIS · 1985 to 2015
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2U10-CA11488-25NCI NIH HHS 5U10-CA11488-34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the induction treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still uncertain. In this trial, a total of 722 patients with newly diagnosed AML, median age 68 years, were randomized into 4 treatment arms: (A) no G-CSF; (B) G-CSF during chemotherapy; (C) G-CSF after chemotherapy until day 28 or recovery of polymorphonuclear leukocytes; and (D) G-CSF during and after chemotherapy. The complete remission (CR) rate was 48.9% in group A, 52.2% in group B, 48.3% in group C, and 64.4% in group D. Analysis according to the 2 x 2 factorial design indicated that the CR rate was significantly higher in patients who received G-CSF during chemotherapy (58.3% for groups B + D vs 48.6% for groups A + C; P = .009), whereas no significant difference was observed between groups A + B and C + D (50.6% vs 56.4%, P = .12). In terms of overall survival, no significant differences were observed between the various groups. Patients who received G-CSF after chemotherapy had a shorter time to neutrophil recovery (median, 20 vs 25 days; P < .001) and a shorter hospitalization (mean, 27.2 vs 29.7 days; P < .001). We conclude that although priming with G-CSF can improve the CR rate, the use of G-CSF during and/or after chemotherapy has no effect on the long-term outcome of AML in older patients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdjuvants, ImmunologicAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLenograstimLeukemia, MyeloidMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsSurvival AnalysisAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntineoplastic AgentsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorLenograstimRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15761020
PMCPMC1895135
OpenAlexW2142036452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.