Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15760064›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2004

Evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres prepared by different methods.

Sanju Dhawan, Anil Kumar Singla, Vivek Ranjan Sinha

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chitosan-Based Nanoencapsulation of Mānuka Oil for Periodontal Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanju DhawanUniversity Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India 160014. sanjudhawan@rediffmail.com.
Anil Kumar Singla
Vivek Ranjan Sinha

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres prepared by different methods were evaluated by studying the interaction between mucin and microspheres in aqueous solution. The interaction was determined by the measurement of mucin adsorbed on the microspheres. A strong interaction between chitosan microspheres and mucin was detected. The intensity of the interaction was dependent upon the method of preparation of chitosan microspheres and the amount of mucin added. The extent of mucus adsorption was proportional to the absolute values of the positive zeta potential of chitosan microspheres. The zeta potential in turn was found to be dependent upon the method of preparation of microspheres. The adsorption of type III mucin (1% sialic acid content) was interpreted using Freundlich or Langmuir adsorption isotherms. The values of r2 were greater for Langmuir isotherm as compared with Freundlich isotherm. The adsorption of a suspension of chitosan microspheres in the rat small intestine indicated that chitosan microspheres prepared by tripolyphosphate cross-linking and emulsification ionotropic gelation can be used as an excellent mucoadhesive delivery system. The microspheres prepared by glutaraldehyde and thermal cross-linking showed good stability in HCl as compared with microspheres prepared by tripolyphosphate and emulsification ionotropic gelation.

Indexed as

AnimalsChitosanIntestinal MucosaIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMicrospheresRatsRats, WistarTechnology, PharmaceuticalTissue AdhesivesChitosanTissue Adhesives

Identifiers

PMID15760064
PMCPMC2750492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.