Trial reportDer Nervenarzt2005
[Guideline conformity and outcome of inpatient treatment for schizophrenia. A clinical comparison].
Trial report in Der Nervenarzt, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the international published literature relating to quality of institutional care for people with longer term mental health problems.BMC psychiatry · 2009Pooled it
- The effects of a clinical care pathway for schizophrenia: a before and after study in 114 patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2012Trial
- [Modern cognitive behavior therapy of psychotic disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [DGPPN recommendations on quality indicators for schizophrenia].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Article
- Effects of an electronic reminder system on guideline-concordant treatment of psychotic disorders : Results from a pilot feasibility trial.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2016Article
- [Assessment of quality indicators with routine data: Presentation of a feasibility test in ten specialist clinics for psychiatry and psychotherapy].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- [Guideline intentions of the German Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Nervous Diseases (DGPPN)].Der Nervenarzt · 2010Article
- [Guideline compliance in the treatment of schizophrenic patients. Introduction of a computer-assisted treatment pathway].Der Nervenarzt · 2010Article
- Quality assurance in psychiatry: quality indicators and guideline implementation.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009Review
- [Aggressive and violent behaviour. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2008Article
- The German Research Network on Schizophrenia--impact on the management of schizophrenia.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient outcome and guideline conformity in inpatient schizophrenia treatment was systematically evaluated and compared with 597 patients across seven psychiatric hospitals. Patient structure and treatment processes showed a great variability between hospitals. Patient characteristics, especially mental state, and the chronicity of the disease were the strongest predictors of clinical outcome. Outcome evaluation using quality indicators is only possible after case-mix adjustment taking into account prognostic factors. A poorer average clinical outcome was associated with lower guideline conformity in a variety of treatment domains. After case-mix adjustment, benchmarking is an opportunity to improve quality of treatment and promote guideline conformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15759161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.