Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15757364›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2005

Functional evolution of a cis-regulatory module.

Michael Z Ludwig, Arnar Palsson, Elena Alekseeva, Casey M Bergman, Janaki Nathan, Martin Kreitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. regCNN: identifyingComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. eLife · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael Z LudwigDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA. mludwig@midway.uchicago.edu <mludwig@midway.uchicago.edu>
Arnar Palsson
Elena Alekseeva
Casey M Bergman
Janaki Nathan
Martin Kreitman

Funding

Evolutionary Mechanisms Governing Gene RegulationR01GM061001 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KREITMAN, MARTIN E. · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061001NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM61001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of knowledge about how regulatory regions evolve in relation to their structure-function may limit the utility of comparative sequence analysis in deciphering cis-regulatory sequences. To address this we applied reverse genetics to carry out a functional genetic complementation analysis of a eukaryotic cis-regulatory module-the even-skipped stripe 2 enhancer-from four Drosophila species. The evolution of this enhancer is non-clock-like, with important functional differences between closely related species and functional convergence between distantly related species. Functional divergence is attributable to differences in activation levels rather than spatiotemporal control of gene expression. Our findings have implications for understanding enhancer structure-function, mechanisms of speciation and computational identification of regulatory modules.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene DeletionGene Expression RegulationGenetic Complementation TestHomeodomain ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPeptide FragmentsTranscription FactorsDrosophila Proteinseve protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain ProteinsPeptide FragmentsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15757364
PMCPMC1064851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.