Trial reportEuropean journal of epidemiology2005
Bayes' theorem: a negative example of a RCT on grommets in children with glue ear.
Trial report in European journal of epidemiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reactions to threatening health messages.BMC public health · 2012Pooled it
- Expert Judgment Supporting a Bayesian Network to Model the Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Prior Elicitation for Use in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bayesian inference presupposes that practitioners' belief in the effectiveness of medical intervention is the product of prior belief and recent evidence from studies. Although increasingly used, up to now the posterior belief calculated according to the theorem has not been compared with an empirically measured posterior belief. We conducted a RCT, which was preceded by elicitation of prior beliefs among ENT-surgeons, and which was followed by elicitation of posterior beliefs among ENT-surgeons, 1 year after completion of the trial. We compared the posterior beliefs of ENT-surgeons about the effect of grommets in children with glue ears, as predicted by Bayes' theorem with actual measured posterior beliefs. The distribution of the measured posterior beliefs was not in line with the calculated posterior, but almost identical to the distribution of the measured prior beliefs. The results showed that our trial had little or no impact on the beliefs of the ENT-surgeons, i.e. they did not adjust their belief to the extent that was expected according to Bayes' theorem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.