ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2004
Secondary structural effects on protein NMR chemical shifts.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identify Beta-Hairpin Motifs with Quadratic Discriminant Algorithm Based on the Chemical Shifts.PloS one · 2015Article
- Prediction of four kinds of simple supersecondary structures in protein by using chemical shifts.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- Mapping of protein structural ensembles by chemical shifts.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2010Article
- Cooperative formation of native-like tertiary contacts in the ensemble of unfolded states of a four-helix protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010Article
- 4D prediction of protein (1)H chemical shifts.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2009Article
- Empirical isotropic chemical shift surfaces.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2007Article
- A simple method to adjust inconsistently referenced 13C and 15N chemical shift assignments of proteins.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For an amino acid in protein, its chemical shift, delta(phi, psi)(s), is expressed as a function of its backbone torsion angles (phi and psi) and secondary state (s): delta(phi, psi)(s=deltaphi, psi)_coil+Deltadelta(phi, psi)_s), where delta(phi, psi)(coil) represents its chemical shift at coil state (s=coil); Delta delta(phi, psi)(s) (s=sheet or helix) is herein defined as secondary structural effect correction factor, which are quantitatively determined from Residue-specific Secondary Structure Shielding Surface (RSS) for (13)CO, (13)Calpha, (13)Cbeta,(1)Halpha, (15)N, and (1)HN nuclei. The secondary structural effect correction factors defined in this study differ from those in earlier investigations by separating out the backbone conformational effects. As a consequence, their magnitudes are significantly smaller than those earlier reported. The present Delta delta(phi, psi)(sheet) and Delta delta(phi, psi)(helix) were found varying little with backbone conformation and the 20 amino acids, specifically for (13)CO, (13)Calpha, and (1)Halpha nuclei. This study also carries out some useful investigations on other chemical shift prediction approaches - the traditional shielding surfaces, SHIFTS, SHIFTX, PROSHIFT, and identifies some unexpected shortcomings with these methods. It provides some useful insights into understanding protein chemical shifts and suggests a new route to improving chemical shifts prediction. The RSS surfaces were incorporated into the program PRSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15754052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.