Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15752382›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005

A predictive model for exemestane pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics incorporating the effect of food and formulation.

Marta Valle, Enrico Di Salle, Maria Gabriella Jannuzzo, Italo Poggesi, Maurizio Rocchetti, Riccardo Spinelli, Davide Verotta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Moving about.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta ValleDepartment of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA-94143, USA. MValle@hsp.santpau.es
Enrico Di Salle
Maria Gabriella Jannuzzo
Italo Poggesi
Maurizio Rocchetti
Riccardo Spinelli
Davide Verotta
NGM Biopharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsExemestane (Aromasin) is an irreversible aromatase inactivator used for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of formulation comparing a sugar-coated tablet (SCT) with a suspension and food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) with respect to plasma estrone sulphate (E1S) concentrations of exemestane, using a PK/PD approach.

methodsThis was an open, three-period, randomized, crossover study. Twelve healthy postmenopausal women received single oral doses of 25 mg exemestane as a SCT after fasting or food and as a suspension after fasting. Exemestane and E1S concentrations were determined before and up to 14 days after drug administration. Population analysis was performed in two steps: (i) a compartmental PK model was selected incorporating the effect of food and formulation; (ii) conditional on the PK model, a PD model was developed employing indirect response models. Model selection was performed using standard statistical tests. Validation and assessment of the predictive capability of the selected model was performed using real test data sets obtained from the literature.

resultsA three-compartment model with first-order elimination rate best described exemestane disposition (k12 0.454, k21 0.158, k13 0.174, k31 0.016 and k 0.738 h(-1)). Absorption was described by a mono-exponential function [ka 2.3 (SCT after fasting), 1.1 (SCT after food) and 7.6 h(-1) (suspension); lag time 0.2 h]. The PD model assumed that E1S plasma concentrations are determined by a zero-order synthesis rate (6.5 pg ml(-1) h(-1)) and a first-order elimination constant (0.032 h(-1)). Exemestane inhibited E1S synthesis with a C50 value of 22.1 pg ml(-1). The mean population estimates were used to simulate the administration of different doses of the drug (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 25 mg day(-1)). The model predictions were in agreement with historical data.

conclusionsExemestane absorption is influenced by the formulation of the drug and by food, but its disposition is independent of both. PK differences do no translate into clinically important differences in the PD. The PK/PD model developed was able to predict successfully the response to different doses and administration schedules with respect to oestrogen suppression.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsAromatase InhibitorsChemistry, PharmaceuticalCross-Over StudiesFastingFemaleFood-Drug InteractionsHumansMiddle AgedAndrostadienesAntineoplastic AgentsAromatase Inhibitorsexemestane

Identifiers

PMID15752382
PMCPMC1884784
OpenAlexW2051216302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.