Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15751567›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2005

Morbidity and mortality audits: "How to"for family practice.

Mark J Yaffe, Geeta Gupta, Susan Still, Miriam Boillat, Balbina Russillo, Benjamin Schiff, Donald Sproule

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark J YaffeDepartment of Family Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec. mark.yaffe@mcgill.ca
Geeta Gupta
Susan Still
Miriam Boillat
Balbina Russillo
Benjamin Schiff
Donald Sproule

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problem being addressedWhile professions hold their members responsible for self-regulation, many physicians have insufficient information about outcome measures in their practices to judge performance and are inexperienced in performing audits to gather the information they need to judge performance. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To develop a structure and process to support family doctors with little experience in doing quality improvement studies to conduct morbidity and mortality (M&M) audits. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A family medicine teaching group provides members on a rotating basis to an M&M review committee. The committee meets eight times a year and has done four audits, the most comprehensive on the topic of preventable hospital admissions. Both implicit and explicit criteria were incorporated into decision making. Strengths and limitations of the audit process and practice changes that resulted from the audit are discussed.

conclusionMorbidity and mortality audits can vary in rigour. To promote physicians' interest in and commitment to audits, factors considered should reflect the goals, needs, skills, and time available of the physicians involved. Practical learning often results from simple projects.

Indexed as

MorbidityMortalityFamily PracticeForms and Records ControlHumansMedical AuditOutcome Assessment, Health CareOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPeer Review, Health CareProfessional Staff CommitteesProgram EvaluationQuebec

Identifiers

PMID15751567
PMCPMC1472972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.