ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2005
Treatment of deep vein thrombosis: what factors determine appropriate treatment?
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Blood advances · 2020Guideline
- Recurrent deep vein thrombosis following brown recluse spider bite complicated by medication noncompliance and residual scar tissue: A rare case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- A case of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and minimal change disease complicated by bilateral pulmonary emboli.SAGE open medical case reports · 2022Article
- A retrospective analysis of outcomes in low- and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism patients managed on an ambulatory medical unit in the UK.ERJ open research · 2019Article
- Management of venous thromboembolism: an update.Thrombosis journal · 2016Review
- Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: Practical Considerations for Emergency Medicine Physicians.Emergency medicine international · 2016Review
- Ambulation after deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2009Article
- Nontreatment of deep vein thrombosis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2005Article
- Massive Fatal Pulmonary Embolism While on Therapeutic Heparin Drip.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for whom in-hospital treatment should be considered. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The literature was searched for studies on outpatient treatment of DVT. Seventeen studies were assessed: seven were randomized controlled trials (level I evidence), and 10 were non-randomized trials (level II evidence). MAIN MESSAGE: Four criteria can be used to identify patients with DVT for whom outpatient treatment might not be appropriate: presence of massive DVT, presence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism, high risk of bleeding with anticoagulant therapy, and presence of comorbid conditions or other factors that warrant in-hospital care.
conclusionFour criteria can be used to identify patients with DVT for whom in-hospital treatment should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15751565PMC1472974W2161945419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.