ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005
Differentiation between atypical isolates of Candida lusitaniae and Candida pulcherrima by determination of mating type.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediator Subunit Med15 Regulates Cell Morphology and Mating inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nosocomial Candiduria in the Elderly: Microbiological Diagnosis.Mycopathologia · 2018Article
- Successful therapy of Candida pulcherrima fungemia in a premature newborn with liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin.Medical mycology case reports · 2016Article
- Community acquired fungemia caused by Candida pulcherrima: diagnostic contribution of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2016Article
- Genetic diversity of medically important and emerging Candida species causing invasive infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2015Article
- Mechanistic plasticity of sexual reproduction and meiosis in the Candida pathogenic species complex.Current biology : CB · 2009Article
- Insight into the role of HOG pathway components Ssk2p, Pbs2p, and Hog1p in the opportunistic yeast Candida lusitaniae.Eukaryotic cell · 2008Article
- Contributions of the response regulators Ssk1p and Skn7p in the pseudohyphal development, stress adaptation, and drug sensitivity of the opportunistic yeast Candida lusitaniae.Eukaryotic cell · 2008Article
- Differential involvement of histidine kinase receptors in pseudohyphal development, stress adaptation, and drug sensitivity of the opportunistic yeast Candida lusitaniae.Eukaryotic cell · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report on five clinical isolates routinely identified as Candida lusitaniae that the ID 32C system was unable to discriminate from the closely related species Candida pulcherrima. When additional tests did not allow accurate identification, the less usual mating type test identified all of them as Clavispora lusitaniae. Mating type testing appears to be a valuable tool for assessing the true incidence of this emerging non-albicans Candida species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.