Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15750044›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2005

Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath.

Roberto F Machado, Daniel Laskowski, Olivia Deffenderfer, Timothy Burch, Shuo Zheng, Peter J Mazzone, Tarek Mekhail, Constance Jennings, James K Stoller, Jacqueline Pyle and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01660087 (Diagnosis of Lung Cancer From Exhaled Breath With Silicon Biophotonic Device.), which is not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01660087 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Diagnosis of Lung Cancer From Exhaled Breath With Silicon Biophotonic Device.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2012 to 2015Enrolled0ConditionsLung CancerArmsBiophotonic platform for VOC detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 603 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Screening for lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Exhaled breath analysis with a colorimetric sensor array for the identification and characterization of lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  8. Artificial Olfactory System Enabled by Ultralow Chemical Sensing Variations of 1D SnOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Regulating the Electron Depletion Layer of Au/VNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto F MachadoDepartment of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Daniel Laskowski
Olivia Deffenderfer
Timothy Burch
Shuo Zheng
Peter J Mazzone
Tarek Mekhail
Constance Jennings
James K Stoller
Jacqueline Pyle
Jennifer Duncan
Raed A Dweik
Serpil C Erzurum
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

NO SYNTHESIS AND CONSUMPTION IN THE LUNGK24HL004265 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COL/MED-CWRU · PI ERZURUM, SERPIL C. · 2000 to 2004
$510k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL04265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleElectronic noses are successfully used in commercial applications, including detection and analysis of volatile organic compounds in the food industry.

objectivesWe hypothesized that the electronic nose could identify and discriminate between lung diseases, especially bronchogenic carcinoma.

methodsIn a discovery and training phase, exhaled breath of 14 individuals with bronchogenic carcinoma and 45 healthy control subjects or control subjects without cancer was analyzed. Principal components and canonic discriminant analysis of the sensor data was used to determine whether exhaled gases could discriminate between cancer and noncancer. Discrimination between classes was performed using Mahalanobis distance. Support vector machine analysis was used to create and apply a cancer prediction model prospectively in a separate group of 76 individuals, 14 with and 62 without cancer. MAIN

resultsPrincipal components and canonic discriminant analysis demonstrated discrimination between samples from patients with lung cancer and those from other groups. In the validation study, the electronic nose had 71.4% sensitivity and 91.9% specificity for detecting lung cancer; positive and negative predictive values were 66.6 and 93.4%, respectively. In this population with a lung cancer prevalence of 18%, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6 and 94.5%, respectively.

conclusionThe exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer has distinct characteristics that can be identified with an electronic nose. The results provide feasibility to the concept of using the electronic nose for managing and detecting lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreath TestsChromatography, GasCross-Sectional StudiesFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID15750044
PMCPMC2718462
OpenAlexW2124721964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.