Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15749779›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2005

The B- to A-DNA transition and the reorganization of solvent at the DNA surface.

Nina Pastor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hydrophobic catalysis and a potential biological role of DNA unstacking induced by environment effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nina PastorFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. nina@servm.fc.uaem.mx

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA geometry depends on relative humidity. Using the CHARMM22 force field to push B-DNA to A-DNA, a molecular dynamics simulation of a mixed-sequence 24-basepair DNA double-stranded oligomer, starting from B-DNA, was carried out to explore both the mechanism of the transition and the evolution of hydration patterns on the surface of DNA. Over the 11-ns trajectory, the transition recapitulates the slide-first, roll-later mechanism, is opposed by DNA electrostatics, and is favored by an increasing amount of condensed sodium ions. Hydration was characterized by counting the hydrogen bonds between water and DNA, and by the number of water bridges linking two DNA atoms. The number of hydrogen bonds between water and DNA remains constant during the transition, but there is a 40% increase in the number of water bridges, in agreement with the principle of economy of hydration. Water bridges emerge as delicate sensors of both structure and dynamics of DNA. Both local flexibility and the frustration of the water network on the surface of DNA probably account for the low populations and short residence times of the bridges, and for the lubricant role of water in ligand-DNA interactions.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBinding, CompetitiveBiophysicsComputer SimulationCrystallography, X-RayDNADNA, A-FormHydrogen BondingIonsLigandsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSodiumSoftwareSolventsStatic ElectricityDNADNA, A-FormIonsLigandsSodiumSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID15749779
PMCPMC1305475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.