Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15749129›Full record

ArticleVirology2005

Epitope mapping and biological function analysis of antibodies produced by immunization of mice with an inactivated Chinese isolate of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV).

Te-hui W Chou, Shixia Wang, Pavlo V Sakhatskyy, Innocent Mboudjeka, Innocent Mboudoudjeck, John M Lawrence, Song Huang, Scott Coley, Baoan Yang, Jiaming Li and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SARS vaccine development.Emerging infectious diseases · 2005
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Mboudoudjeck, Innocent [corrected to Mboudjeka, Innocent]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Te-hui W ChouLaboratory of Nucleic Acid Vaccines, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, Lazare Research Building, Worcester, MA 01605-2397, USA.
Shixia Wang
Pavlo V Sakhatskyy
Innocent Mboudjeka
Innocent Mboudoudjeck
John M Lawrence
Song Huang
Scott Coley
Baoan Yang
Jiaming Li
Qingyu Zhu
Shan Lu
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USAcademy of Military Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY PROGRAMP30DK032520 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CZECH, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2010
$14.6M
GENE GUN MEDIATED MUCOSAL INFECTION WITH PROVIRAL DNASR21AI044338 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LU, SHAN · 1999 to 2000
$206k
IMMUNOGENICITY OF HIV DNA VACCINER29AI040337 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LU, SHAN · 1997 to 2001
$166k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 40337NIAID NIH HHS AI 44338NIDDK NIH HHS 5P30DK32520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK032520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) has been tested as a candidate vaccine against the re-emergence of SARS. In order to understand the efficacy and safety of this approach, it is important to know the antibody specificities generated with inactivated SARS-CoV. In the current study, a panel of twelve monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was established by immunizing Balb/c mice with the inactivated BJ01 strain of SARS-CoV isolated from the lung tissue of a SARS-infected Chinese patient. These mAbs could recognize SARS-CoV-infected cells by immunofluorescence analysis (IFA). Seven of them were mapped to the specific segments of recombinant spike (S) protein: six on S1 subunit (aa 12-798) and one on S2 subunit (aa 797-1192). High neutralizing titers against SARS-CoV were detected with two mAbs (1A5 and 2C5) targeting at a subdomain of S protein (aa 310-535), consistent with the previous report that this segment of S protein contains the major neutralizing domain. Some of these S-specific mAbs were able to recognize cleaved products of S protein in SARS-CoV-infected Vero E6 cells. None of the remaining five mAbs could recognize either of the recombinant S, N, M, or E antigens by ELISA. This study demonstrated that the inactivated SARS-CoV was able to preserve the immunogenicity of S protein including its major neutralizing domain. The relative ease with which these mAbs were generated against SARS-CoV virions further supports that subunit vaccination with S constructs may also be able to protect animals and perhaps humans. It is somewhat unexpected that no N-specific mAbs were identified albeit anti-N IgG was easily identified in SARS-CoV-infected patients. The availability of this panel of mAbs also provided potentially useful agents with applications in therapy, diagnosis, and basic research of SARS-CoV.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChinaChlorocebus aethiopsEpitope MappingHumansImmunizationMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeutralization TestsRabbitsSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralMembrane GlycoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVspike protein, mouse hepatitis virusVaccines, InactivatedViral Envelope ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID15749129
PMCPMC7111783
OpenAlexW1977874517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.