Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15747141›Full record

GuidelineDer Anaesthesist2005

[Locoregional anesthesia and coagulation inhibitors. Recommendations of the Task Force on Perioperative Coagulation of the Austrian Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine].

S A Kozek-Langenecker, D Fries, M Gütl, N Hofmann, P Innerhofer, W Kneifl, L Neuner, P Perger, T Pernerstorfer, G Pfanner and 2 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractGuideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Der Anaesthesist, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs in pregnancy: what are the anesthetic implications for labor and cesarean delivery?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2011
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S A Kozek-LangeneckerUniversitätsklinik für Allgemeine Anaesthesie und Intensivmedizin B, Wien. sibylle.kozek@medunivie.ac.at
D Fries
M Gütl
N Hofmann
P Innerhofer
W Kneifl
L Neuner
P Perger
T Pernerstorfer
G Pfanner
H Schöchl
Task Force on Perioperative Coagulation of the Austrian Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Klinik Hietzing · ATOrthopädische Universitätsklinik · DELandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATUnfallkrankenhaus Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More efficacious anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents have been introduced in vascular medicine and in the prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolisms. Patient management should be guided by familiarity with the pharmacology of coagulation-altering drugs and by consensus statements. The present paper reviews recommendations from the Austrian Task Force for Perioperative Coagulation which are based on thorough evaluation of the available pharmacological information and case reports. The consensus statement focuses on neuraxial and peripheral techniques and is designed to encourage safe and quality patient care.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, LocalAnticoagulantsHumansIntraoperative CareMonitoring, IntraoperativeNerve BlockPostoperative ComplicationsAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID15747141
OpenAlexW110589194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.